PRO Trashman’s Week 10 Flex Rankings: WR, RB, TE

Trashman 750

Get FREE ENTRY into DraftKings’ Week 10 $1.5 MILLION contest ONLY by signing up for an account here!

Often times, there is nothing tougher (or more important) than deciding who your weekly flex-plays are. It can be a mind-numbing experience having to make cross-positional projections.

This season, our RosterWatch PRO community will have personal and exclusive access to our very own disgusting Trashman, who has carefully curated his personal weekly flex rankings in order to help you in gaining input about your roster decisions.

PLEASE Keep in mind, these are not our official RosterWatch Week 10 rankings, but we’ve learned over time to pay extra-special attention to what the Trashman might have up his filthy sleeve – and where he stacks up players against one another for the coming week’s slate cross-positionally.

Our OFFICIAL rankings page here on the site will continue to be updated through the day Saturday and Sunday morning as more information comes in and we become more comfortable with player slotting. In the meantime, have a look at how the Trashman sees Week 10’s Sunday and Monday slate shaking out – as his inputs to our formula are a key (albeit smelly and gross) component.

Click here to go to the spreadsheet (PRO membership required)

18 Comments

  1. Trade question ppr : I’d be getting Montgomery for Kelley. Starting rbs are booker and leveon. Also got perkins, prosise, and Henry.

    1. Depends on your wr situation. Montgomery is still a wr in my league… I think once Starks is back healthy he won’t see the field as much… whereas Kelley could run away with early down work

      1. Yea I think you have to value the starting RB more. Plus 3 largest last week for Ty M was a bad sign. There are just so many catchers in GB.

  2. Are rankings down on Ware this week due to coming off concussion or just matchup? Trying to decide on him, cooks, or J. Matthews in the flex. Already have lev bell and forte at RB. Green and Fitz at WR

    Feeling Matthews matchup but typically roll with an rb in the flex… thoughts??

    1. Combination of both regarding Ware. Luke K is going to be chasing him all day and they will be watching his head closely. It feels like a high risk high reward play…

      Vegas has him with more yards than Cooks and Mathews. I usually default to that number when making tight choices.

    2. Made some adjustments since Friday. I like Ware there.

  3. 12 Team PPR
    Rushing Yards: 8 yards per point; 8 points at 110 yards
    Receiving Yards: 10 yards per point; 8 points at 115 yards

    Start which 2 out of the following for two FLEX spots:

    Perkins vs. CIN
    Bibbs @NO
    C. Michael @NE
    Prosise @NE
    Rudolph @WAS

    1. Prosise and Rudolph. It would be real nice if C Michael missed.

  4. Edelman or jj nelson ppr

    1. JJ Nelson

  5. Must Win this week and need 3 of the 4 in PPR
    Spencer Ware, Devontae Booker, Brandin Cooks, Allen Robinson?

    1. Might sit ARob outta that bunch -very tough decision. GL

  6. Shows week 9 when I click on spreadsheet

    1. Maybe he mislabeled it wk 9 or something but the link is correct

  7. Non ppr, one RB out of the following. Ware, Montgomery, Prosise, Perkins. Most rankings say Ware but Carolina D has been shutting RBs down and I’m not feeling it. I do have the “luxury” of waiting until tonight/Monday to see where I’m at with my opponent…if so, then it comes down to Prosise or Perkins (leaning Perkins). Can’t figure this one out man…help!

    1. i’d stick with ware. tough matchup but no maclin. starks and michael could be active. perkins might be the best bet if you’re set on not using ware

      1. Thanks brother…I’ll roll with Ware (fingers crossed)

  8. Post By Steelnation1825

    Trade question
    .5 PPR
    Trading away Evans and Miller and would receive Bell and Jeffery. Would this be a trade worth making or better off keeping who I have?

    My Rbs right now are David Johnson, Booker, Miller, Jennings, Prosise, Dixon.
    My Wrs/Tes are Evans, Hopkins, Olsen, Meredith, Coleman, and Fuller.

Leave a Reply